Compliance record
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 783.45 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 986 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.942 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L | 37/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0039 mg/L 26% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| TTHM | 30.0105 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33.5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 18.3135 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.01 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.147 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.18 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 18.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.66 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.8750 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.86 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.064 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.16 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 10.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Arsenic | 8.94 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Barium | 247 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Chromium | 1.58 µg/L 1.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.9600 pCi/L 19% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.49 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Fluoride | 733 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.5000 pCi/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.84 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
76 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Southeast Wud (East)
Is Southeast Wud (East) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Southeast Wud (East)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Southeast Wud (East)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Southeast Wud (East) serve?
Southeast Wud (East) reports serving 4,225 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has Southeast Wud (East) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Southeast Wud (East).
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.