Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Barney City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
10
detected
52
people served
0
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Richland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
32
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01
MR Monitoring Archived 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
452.6 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 882 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
0.0019 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 17/17 LCR 2023
Lead
2.025 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.16 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
4.5035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.51 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
16.3585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.38 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
0.8780 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.3025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.35 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
21.704 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.73 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.03 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.08 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.7275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.73 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MOORE, BRENT
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Barney City of

Is Barney City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Barney City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Barney City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Barney City of serve?

Barney City of reports serving 52 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Barney City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 32 violations on file for Barney City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.