← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Greater Ramsey Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 95 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

95
contaminants tested
16
detected
5,280
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ramsey

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-11-01 → 2001-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-11-01 → 2001-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2001-11-01 → 2001-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1064 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2023
Lead
4.4 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
9/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
1.206 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.26 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
1.206 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.26 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.1617 pCi/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.1660 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
16.502 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Lithium
88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
3.9 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
42.3 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Chromium
3.17 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5600 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
0.6600 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
17.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
710 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrate-NitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LACINA, LONNIE
Phone
701-662-5781
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Greater Ramsey Water District

Is Greater Ramsey Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Greater Ramsey Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Greater Ramsey Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Greater Ramsey Water District serve?

Greater Ramsey Water District reports serving 5,280 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Greater Ramsey Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Greater Ramsey Water District, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.