Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Rugby City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 64 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

64
contaminants tested
19
detected
2,876
people served
0
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pierce

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-08-01 → 2021-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1994-06-07
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1994-06-07

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
43.82 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 91.3 µg/L
24/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0086 mg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
180 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
8.615 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.78 µg/L
11/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11.566 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.71 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
24.004 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.25 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.988 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.33 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8.758 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.34 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
41.734 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.19 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.462 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.596 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.98 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.7175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.87 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
0.7090 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
3.46 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
8.74 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Chromium
1.87 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Combined Uranium
1.85 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
756 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
4.14 pCi/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
45 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
STEWART, JENNIFER
Phone
701-776-6181
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rugby City of

Is Rugby City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Rugby City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rugby City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rugby City of serve?

Rugby City of reports serving 2,876 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Rugby City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Rugby City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.