Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Beulah City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 95 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

95
contaminants tested
17
detected
3,058
people served
10
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Mercer

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
13
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2003-10-01 → 2003-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1997-01-01 → 1997-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
586.8 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 630 µg/L
128/130 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
3.009 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L
38/130 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.8045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.69 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.0005 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.53 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
9.062 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.85 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
11.351 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.12 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
180 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
18.4075 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Fluoride
817.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Lithium
27.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 UCMR-5 2023
Arsenic
5.11 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.5700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.2400 pCi/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Pentachlorophenol
0.0300 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2017–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOVKOON, GARY

Frequently asked questions about Beulah City of

Is Beulah City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Beulah City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Beulah City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Beulah City of serve?

Beulah City of reports serving 3,058 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Beulah City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 13 violations on file for Beulah City of, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.