Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Tuttle City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 65 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

65
contaminants tested
19
detected
80
people served
16
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kidder

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
38
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-05-01 → 1994-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0099 mg/L 66%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
70 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
412.85 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 433 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8.952 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.661 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.24 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
1.296 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.31 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
16.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.93 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.406 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.59 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Dibromochloromethane
11.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.73 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
43.537 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.21 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
18.397 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.006 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.31 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
13.1 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Chromium
6.49 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5300 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
77 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.58 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Selenium
1.35 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
46 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WITT, RENAE

Frequently asked questions about Tuttle City of

Is Tuttle City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Tuttle City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tuttle City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tuttle City of serve?

Tuttle City of reports serving 80 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Tuttle City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 38 violations on file for Tuttle City of, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.