Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 407.45 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 456 µg/L | 44/47 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 920 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.542 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.072 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.18 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.661 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 4.639 µg/L 5.8% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 1.4605 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.48 µg/L | 4/47 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate | 800 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 15.2 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.5200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.14 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.25 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Combined Uranium | -0.040 µg/L -0.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.01 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 844 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 2 pCi/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.01 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
79 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Central Regional Wd-Gf
Is East Central Regional Wd-Gf tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in East Central Regional Wd-Gf's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Central Regional Wd-Gf's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Central Regional Wd-Gf serve?
East Central Regional Wd-Gf reports serving 5,995 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has East Central Regional Wd-Gf had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for East Central Regional Wd-Gf, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.