← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Beach City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
10
detected
981
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Golden Valley

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
27
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1996-11-01 → 1996-11-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
99.23 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 113 µg/L
19/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
2.188 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
12.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.66 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
15.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
14.448 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.16 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
16.612 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.84 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.4645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.61 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Lead
19.879 µg/L 133%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L
2/20 SYR4 2014–2017
34 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
GAUGLER, KIM
Phone
701-872-4103
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Beach City of

Is Beach City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Beach City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Beach City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Beach City of serve?

Beach City of reports serving 981 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Beach City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Beach City of, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.