Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

New Rockford City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 65 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

65
contaminants tested
17
detected
1,391
people served
7
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Eddy

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1998-01-01 → 1998-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 23/23 LCR 2025
Copper
89.09 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 105 µg/L
22/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
190 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
11.32 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.1 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.0375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.13 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.09 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.56 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
9.141 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.38 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2019
Barium
38.414 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Fluoride
1072 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1080 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Selenium
1.453 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.48 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Chloroform
0.5495 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5500 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.476 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
0.5495 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5500 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.7200 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Combined Uranium
1.1 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.61 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2014–2019
48 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PRESNELL, ANDREW
Phone
701-947-2461
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about New Rockford City of

Is New Rockford City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in New Rockford City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Rockford City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Rockford City of serve?

New Rockford City of reports serving 1,391 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has New Rockford City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for New Rockford City of, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.