← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Southeast Wud (West)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 67 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

67
contaminants tested
23
detected
1,275
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dickey

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
29/29 LCR 2025
Copper
726.1 µg/L 56%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 772 µg/L
19/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
17.214 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.07 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
19.596 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.74 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
5.214 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.55 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
9.992 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
30.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.85 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
68.854 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.75 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
15.626 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.57 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.187 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.46 µg/L
15/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.998 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.13 µg/L
13/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.744 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
7/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
591 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L
7/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.214 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.22 µg/L
3/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.716 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.74 µg/L
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.85 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
46.1 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Chromium
4.8 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4000 pCi/L 8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Combined Uranium
1.05 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
266 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
6.72 pCi/L 45%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
Selenium
2.52 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
44 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BOMMERSBACH, TROY
Phone
701-883-4251
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Southeast Wud (West)

Is Southeast Wud (West) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Southeast Wud (West)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Southeast Wud (West)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Southeast Wud (West) serve?

Southeast Wud (West) reports serving 1,275 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Southeast Wud (West) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Southeast Wud (West).

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.