Is Fullerton City of Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Dickey

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1998-08-01 → 1998-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	1997-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	1997-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	1997-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	1997-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	304.5 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 364 µg/L	15/15	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2024
Lead	5.71 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 6.49 µg/L	7/15	SYR4	2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane	5.201 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.25 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Bromoform	11.319 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 11.71 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Chloroform	1.777 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid	5.4945 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.57 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane	13.3825 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 13.66 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
TTHM	31.6255 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 32.34 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	8.9825 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L	2/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.18 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid	4 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid	1.04 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/2	SYR4	2014–2017

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Dichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: PETERSON, BLAKE
Phone: 701-210-0043
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Fullerton City of

Is Fullerton City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Fullerton City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fullerton City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fullerton City of serve?

Fullerton City of reports serving 54 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Fullerton City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 25 violations on file for Fullerton City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.