Is Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Cass

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1308.5 µg/L 101% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1340 µg/L	30/30	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	3.019 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 3.91 µg/L	19/30	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2024
Bromodichloromethane	4.545 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.58 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	5.7585 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.86 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.6895 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	2.6055 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	12.986 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 13.14 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	4.893 µg/L 8.2% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 5.04 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	2.312 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.34 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	30 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	2/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	5.14 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2016
Barium	37.7 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Chromium	3.33 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	0.1100 pCi/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2017
Combined Uranium	1.96 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2017
Fluoride	846 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	1.68 pCi/L 11% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L	1/1	SYR4	2017

47 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BRINKMAN, BRENT
Phone: 701-428-3139
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii

Is Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii serve?

Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii reports serving 1,682 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Cass Rural Water District-Phase Iii.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.