← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Horace City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 65 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

65
contaminants tested
18
detected
1,641
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cass

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
34
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-11-19
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-10-13
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01 → 2018-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01 → 2018-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-03-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1096 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1750 µg/L
27/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.884 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.19 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
3.495 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.366 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.87 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.21 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.8985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.1425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.15 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
0.5965 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.4475 pCi/L 49%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.55 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.966 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.98 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.12 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
42.3 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
346 µg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.2 pCi/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
7.08 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
47 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitrate-NitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CARPENTER, ADAM
Phone
701-282-9727
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Horace City of

Is Horace City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Horace City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Horace City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Dibromoacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Horace City of serve?

Horace City of reports serving 1,641 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Horace City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 34 violations on file for Horace City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.