Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Harwood City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 67 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

67
contaminants tested
24
detected
718
people served
10
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cass

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
46
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-12-01 → 2015-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
822.2 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 891 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
81.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85.09 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
36.606 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.08 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
105.81 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 109.8 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.45 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
13.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
26/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
17.405 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.29 µg/L
26/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0067 mg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2024
Chloroform
2.3865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
10/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.902 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L
9/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1424 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1440 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.047 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.18 µg/L
8/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.221 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.39 µg/L
8/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
1440 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2014–2015
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4887 pCi/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.5100 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2017
Combined Uranium
0.3240 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3600 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.403 pCi/L 23%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.508 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.57 µg/L
2/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.93 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Barium
21.6 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Chromium
3.13 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Fluoride
1190 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Selenium
2.59 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/28 SYR4 2012–2019
43 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HANSEN, CHAYLA
Phone
701-281-0314
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Harwood City of

Is Harwood City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Harwood City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Harwood City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Harwood City of serve?

Harwood City of reports serving 718 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Harwood City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for Harwood City of, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.