Compliance record
Other contaminants detected
Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is
well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the
limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there
means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a
running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this
system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a
violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it
is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 344.3 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 721 µg/L | 60/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.444 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.64 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 48.289 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.11 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.804 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.14 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 70.51 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.69 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.4 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.672 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.41 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.347 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.48 µg/L | 55/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.21 µg/L | 43/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.219 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L | 40/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 1.6595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L | 30/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromate | 3.65 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 12/27 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.37 µg/L | 11/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 464 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 720 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 34.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Barium | 16.135 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Fluoride | 808 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Nitrate | 80 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Chromium | 2.7 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.0900 pCi/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.84 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.04 pCi/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 0.0300 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 1 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
74 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Central Rwd North Burleigh
Is South Central Rwd North Burleigh tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in South Central Rwd North Burleigh's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Central Rwd North Burleigh's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Central Rwd North Burleigh serve?
South Central Rwd North Burleigh reports serving 10,400 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has South Central Rwd North Burleigh had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for South Central Rwd North Burleigh.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.