Compliance record
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0059 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.1025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.17 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.171 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.65 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.5135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.48 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 72.217 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.16 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 30.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.4 µg/L | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.335 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.84 µg/L | 51/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.3855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.97 µg/L | 50/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 84.94 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L | 43/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.239 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.33 µg/L | 39/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.9935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L | 32/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.197 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.34 µg/L | 12/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 294.98 µg/L 1967% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 416 µg/L | 7/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 79.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.467 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L | 3/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Central Regional Water District
Is South Central Regional Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in South Central Regional Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Central Regional Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Central Regional Water District serve?
South Central Regional Water District reports serving 3,700 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.
Has South Central Regional Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for South Central Regional Water District.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.