← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

South Central Regional Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
16
detected
3,700
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
GUP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Burleigh

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0059 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
17.1025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.17 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
50.171 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.65 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.5135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.48 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
72.217 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.16 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.4 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44.335 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 67.84 µg/L
51/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.3855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.97 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
84.94 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 111 µg/L
43/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.239 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.33 µg/L
39/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.9935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
32/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.197 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.34 µg/L
12/52 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
294.98 µg/L 1967%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 416 µg/L
7/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
79.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.467 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L
3/52 SYR4 2012–2019
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfuna

Utility contact

Contact
KIRSCHMANN, LARRY
Phone
701-258-8710
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about South Central Regional Water District

Is South Central Regional Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in South Central Regional Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Central Regional Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Central Regional Water District serve?

South Central Regional Water District reports serving 3,700 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has South Central Regional Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for South Central Regional Water District.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.