Tap WaterIndex

← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Wing City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 65 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

65
contaminants tested
13
detected
152
people served
0
health-based violations
North Dakota rankingsLead in North DakotaPFAS in North Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Burleigh

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
58
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-11-01 → 2023-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-10-02

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0390 mg/L 260%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
 25/25 LCR 2026
Copper
573.15 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 657 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
17.67 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L
7/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
0.7900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.458 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.51 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
TTHM
0.7900 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.458 µg/L 4.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.51 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3900 pCi/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.3900 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
0.9820 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
60 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
25.6 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Fluoride
290 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2016
Pentachlorophenol
0.0200 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2017
52 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HEIN, JULIE
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wing City of

Is Wing City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Wing City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wing City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wing City of serve?

Wing City of reports serving 152 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Wing City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 58 violations on file for Wing City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.