Is Dakota Adventist Academy Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GUP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Burleigh

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2002-02-01 → 2002-02-28
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2002-02-01 → 2002-02-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1995-01-01 → 1996-04-18
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1995-01-01 → 1996-04-18
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1995-01-01 → 1996-04-18
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1994-07-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1994-07-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1994-07-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1994-01-01 → 1995-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0027 mg/L 18% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	21/21	LCR	2025
Copper	602.2 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 619 µg/L	13/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	11.875 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12.31 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Chloroform	26.3975 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 26.99 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane	6.8575 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.15 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	15.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	4.0875 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 4.29 µg/L	6/15	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	43.8925 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 45.26 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	22.0375 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 24.23 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	3.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.74 µg/L	6/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.932 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.99 µg/L	3/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromoform	0.9485 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.9700 µg/L	2/6	SYR4	2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	2.88 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/6	SYR4	2014–2019

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: GARRETT, ERIC
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Dakota Adventist Academy

Is Dakota Adventist Academy tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Dakota Adventist Academy's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dakota Adventist Academy's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dakota Adventist Academy serve?

Dakota Adventist Academy reports serving 80 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Dakota Adventist Academy had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 51 violations on file for Dakota Adventist Academy, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.