← North Dakota

Tap water quality report

Bismarck City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 26. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
26
detected
72,417
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Burleigh

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
72.6885 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 142.5 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.079 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L
244/244 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18.306 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.41 µg/L
242/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52.885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 105.8 µg/L
242/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.17 µg/L
241/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
241/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
226/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
15.32 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 186.8 µg/L
159/259 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.68 µg/L
131/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
136 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
65/257 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
2.958 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.57 µg/L
63/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2024
Nitrate-Nitrite
320 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.408 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L
13/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
40.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Barium
19.59 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.074 pCi/L 21%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.17 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Fluoride
758 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Arsenic
1.7045 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.73 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
0.0950 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1400 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.4370 pCi/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.4400 pCi/L
2/3 SYR4 2015–2017
Cyanide
66 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Dichloromethane
1.1 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2015–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Pentachlorophenol
0.0300 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Selenium
1.23 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2015–2017
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MART, MICHAEL
Phone
701-355-1700
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Bismarck City of

Is Bismarck City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Bismarck City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bismarck City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bismarck City of serve?

Bismarck City of reports serving 72,417 people in North Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Bismarck City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Bismarck City of.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.