Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 788.2 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2108 µg/L | 378/514 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 88.2 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L | 115/115 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.85 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 104/114 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.75 µg/L | 100/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.324 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69 µg/L | 97/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 34.11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.87 µg/L | 96/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 89/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 12.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 88/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 82/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 18.3625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L | 80/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 35.398 µg/L 236% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 328.3 µg/L | 57/514 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 28/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 24/24 | LCR | 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 9/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 386 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.1000 pCi/L 2% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 4/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 1584 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1565.25 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1584 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pender County Utilities
Is Pender County Utilities tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Pender County Utilities's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pender County Utilities's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pender County Utilities serve?
Pender County Utilities reports serving 32,302 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Pender County Utilities had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 156 violations on file for Pender County Utilities, of which 86 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.