Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-14 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 63.85 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.3315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 20.081 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 28.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.02 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 55/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 19.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.21 µg/L | 43/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 29/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 177.275 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 10/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 4.9 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 3/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
22 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Moore Water District
Is East Moore Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in East Moore Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Moore Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Moore Water District serve?
East Moore Water District reports serving 9,330 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has East Moore Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for East Moore Water District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.