Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-11-01 → 2022-11-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 71.7 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L | 241/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.045 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.4 µg/L | 238/246 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.1 µg/L | 230/232 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L | 230/232 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 230/232 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.5 µg/L | 224/233 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 215/233 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 10.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 188/233 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 22.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 143/232 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.2575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 34/233 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 34/233 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 495 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L | 11/90 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 92.4 µg/L 616% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 8/90 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
22 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg
Is Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg serve?
Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg reports serving 65,000 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 40 violations on file for Old North Utilities Services/Ft Bragg, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.