Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
75 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Lake S/D
Is South Lake S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in South Lake S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Lake S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Lake S/D serve?
South Lake S/D reports serving 106 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has South Lake S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for South Lake S/D, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.