Is Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Wilson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Chlorite	513 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L worst single sample: 690 µg/L	135/139	SYR4	2016–2019
Copper	1232 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1582 µg/L	41/80	SYR4	2016–2019
Bromodichloromethane	14.62 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 19.3 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Chloroform	81.11 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 84.1 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	26.665 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
TTHM	99.04 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 101.9 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	58.86 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 69 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	28.985 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.66 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L	12/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	10/10	LCR	2025
Lead	12.6 µg/L 84% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 13 µg/L	5/80	SYR4	2016–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	9.7 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10 µg/L	3/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.54 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L	3/14	SYR4	2016–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/14	SYR4	2016–2019

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact: SEARS, DANIEL
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center

Is Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center serve?

Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center reports serving 200 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.