← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Swepsonville, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
2,497
people served
44
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Alamance

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

44
health-based violations
101
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-05-01 → 2007-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-04-01 → 2007-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
87.73 µg/L 110%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 88 µg/L
39/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
57.265 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 85.8 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
58.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
481.6 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 892 µg/L
20/70 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
30.6 µg/L 204%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
18/70 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
6/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
3/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/25 SYR4 2013–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
ALBRIGHT, AMY
Phone
336-578-5644
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Swepsonville, Town of

Is Swepsonville, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Swepsonville, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Swepsonville, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Swepsonville, Town of serve?

Swepsonville, Town of reports serving 2,497 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Swepsonville, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 101 violations on file for Swepsonville, Town of, of which 44 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.