Is Shiloh Church Road S/D Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Cabarrus

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

137

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	56.815 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 65.4 µg/L	60/60	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	115.23 µg/L 144% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 135.1 µg/L	59/60	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	29.64 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 39.1 µg/L	57/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	25.68 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L	57/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	14.45 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 16 µg/L	56/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	98.825 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 116.9 µg/L	56/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	2.925 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3 µg/L	44/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.04 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L	25/57	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	1/1	LCR	2025

5 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformCopperDibromoacetic AcidLeadMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: MELTON, WILMER
Phone: 704-920-4231
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Shiloh Church Road S/D

Is Shiloh Church Road S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Shiloh Church Road S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shiloh Church Road S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shiloh Church Road S/D serve?

Shiloh Church Road S/D reports serving 3,102 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Shiloh Church Road S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 137 violations on file for Shiloh Church Road S/D, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.