Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 96 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102.3 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 22.435 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 26.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 58.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70.5 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 27/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 26/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 24/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 13/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 9.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 13/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 550 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 670 µg/L | 7/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.647 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L | 3/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.9 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Brookdale Development
Is Brookdale Development tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Brookdale Development's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Brookdale Development's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Brookdale Development serve?
Brookdale Development reports serving 81 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Brookdale Development had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 33 violations on file for Brookdale Development, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.