Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-07-01 → 2013-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-06-01 → 2002-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-06-01 → 2002-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-06-01 → 2002-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-06-01 → 2002-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 79 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 104 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 75.66 µg/L 126% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 92.9 µg/L | 73/78 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.2635 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.95 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 48.8195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.63 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 32.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 329.55 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 559 µg/L | 40/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 24/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 23/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.9844 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 22/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 4.9 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 3/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
24 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Seymour Johnson Afb
Is Seymour Johnson Afb tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Seymour Johnson Afb's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Seymour Johnson Afb's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Seymour Johnson Afb serve?
Seymour Johnson Afb reports serving 6,875 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Seymour Johnson Afb had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 26 violations on file for Seymour Johnson Afb, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.