← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Grifton, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
21
detected
2,982
people served
6
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pitt

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

6
health-based violations
210
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-06-18 → 1991-07-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0062 µg/L 6/6 2024
PFOS 0.0115 µg/L 6/6 2024
PFHXS 0.0062 µg/L 5/6 2024
PFOA 0.0065 µg/L 5/6 2024
Pfpea 0.0066 µg/L 5/6 2024
PFBS 0.0044 µg/L 4/6 2024
Pfba 0.0068 µg/L 3/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
422.05 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 642 µg/L
78/100 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
102.75 µg/L 128%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 139 µg/L
46/46 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61.98 µg/L 103%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.7 µg/L
45/45 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
15.2 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
27/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
24.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.1 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
8.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L
24/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.575 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
20/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
5/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
484 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
4/4 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.395 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/25 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
84 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KING, JEREMY
Phone
919-222-8866
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Grifton, Town of

Is Grifton, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Grifton, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Grifton, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Grifton, Town of serve?

Grifton, Town of reports serving 2,982 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Grifton, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 210 violations on file for Grifton, Town of, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.