Is Summersill Estates No 1 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Onslow

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

220

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2003-01-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2003-01-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2003-01-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2003-01-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-12-18
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-12-18
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-12-18
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-19
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-19
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2025-07-19

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	73 µg/L 91% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 86 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	31.35 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 32 µg/L	14/14	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	11.016 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12.54 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Chloroform	62.158 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 70.63 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	20 µg/L No EPA limit set	13/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	11.4 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Dibromochloromethane	4.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6 µg/L	11/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Copper	238.25 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 261 µg/L	8/15	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	4/4	LCR	2025
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3 µg/L	3/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Bromoform	3 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/13	SYR4	2015–2019
Lead	5.749 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	1/15	SYR4	2013–2019

2 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: ARAGONA, SHARON
Phone: 910-455-3743
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Summersill Estates No 1

Is Summersill Estates No 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Summersill Estates No 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Summersill Estates No 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Summersill Estates No 1 serve?

Summersill Estates No 1 reports serving 163 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Summersill Estates No 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 220 violations on file for Summersill Estates No 1, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.