Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 81.34 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87.46 µg/L | 67/67 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 53 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.5175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.39 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 59.9395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.63 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 26.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 487.2 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 694 µg/L | 29/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.97065 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.847 µg/L | 24/32 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 6/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.0476 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.048 µg/L | 2/32 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 5.9 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 2/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range
Is Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range serve?
Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range reports serving 3,500 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for Usmc Lejeune--Rifle Range, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.