← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
16
detected
11,500
people served
11
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Onslow

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

11
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
74.25 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 128 µg/L
136/136 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
24 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.1 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24.9685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.46 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
36.685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62.06 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
16.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.3 µg/L
108/108 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.505 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
692.4 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 789 µg/L
80/92 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
67/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
4.2124 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.534 µg/L
33/108 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
15.8 µg/L 105%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
27/92 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
9/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
333 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
32.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2025
93 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
VOORHEES, TRAVIS
Phone
910-451-9518
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St

Is Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St serve?

Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St reports serving 11,500 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for Usmc Lejeune--New River Air St, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.