← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Nashville, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
23
detected
5,900
people served
19
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nash

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

19
health-based violations
818
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.4900 µg/L 7/10 2025
PFOA 0.0066 µg/L 5/10 2025
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 2/10 2025
PFHXS 0.0350 µg/L 2/10 2025
Pfhps 0.0036 µg/L 1/10 2025
Pfhxa 0.0046 µg/L 1/10 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
76.4 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 107 µg/L
74/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.825 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.4 µg/L
74/79 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
17.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
62.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.2 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
50/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
3169.5 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3390 µg/L
30/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1261.85 µg/L 97%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1372 µg/L
28/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
19/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.335 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
12/56 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Lead
18.75 µg/L 125%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
4/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
542 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 590 µg/L
3/11 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.2 pCi/L 24%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
3.4866 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
9.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/10 UCMR-5 2025
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NEVILLE, CHAD
Phone
252-459-4511
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Nashville, Town of

Is Nashville, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Nashville, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Nashville, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Nashville, Town of serve?

Nashville, Town of reports serving 5,900 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Nashville, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 818 violations on file for Nashville, Town of, of which 19 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.