← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
17
detected
15,630
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Halifax

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
38
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2017-02-11
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0054 µg/L 3/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
370 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 5760 µg/L
444/522 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
45.35 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.6 µg/L
134/134 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
69.45 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102.7 µg/L
132/134 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
44.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59 µg/L
103/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
103/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
102/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
95/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
127.6 µg/L 851%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 851 µg/L
73/522 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
54/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
16.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
30/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
15.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
19/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
878 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 950 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
23.9 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/103 SYR4 2013–2019
93 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromateChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WRENN, THOMAS
Phone
252-537-9137
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist

Is Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Chloroform, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist serve?

Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist reports serving 15,630 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 38 violations on file for Roanoke Rapids Sanitary Dist, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.