← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Chinquapin Water Association

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
16
detected
4,686
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Duplin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
143
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-02-01 → 2019-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
59.475 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
40.75 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 121 µg/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
634.8 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1390 µg/L
25/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
11.9165 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.23 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
48.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.8 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
778 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 862 µg/L
16/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00030 mg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2028
Dibromochloromethane
2.9509 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.161 µg/L
12/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
26.8324 µg/L 179%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
9/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9400 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2015
Monochloroacetic Acid
7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Xylenes, Total
3 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2012–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MAREADY, NATHAN
Phone
910-285-2478
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chinquapin Water Association

Is Chinquapin Water Association tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Chinquapin Water Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chinquapin Water Association's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chinquapin Water Association serve?

Chinquapin Water Association reports serving 4,686 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Chinquapin Water Association had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 143 violations on file for Chinquapin Water Association, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.