← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Ellerbe Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
2,050
people served
59
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Richmond

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

59
health-based violations
139
violations on file
10
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2025-12-10
TT Health-based Addressed 2025-12-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
84.15 µg/L 140%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
58/59 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
102 µg/L 127%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.315 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
90.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 96 µg/L
52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
36.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52 µg/L
50/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
45.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
49/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
34/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
556.25 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 789 µg/L
20/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
8/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
18.73 µg/L 125%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L
4/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0370 mg/L 247%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2025
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
ENGLISH, JAMIE
Phone
910-652-6251
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ellerbe Town of

Is Ellerbe Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Ellerbe Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ellerbe Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ellerbe Town of serve?

Ellerbe Town of reports serving 2,050 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Ellerbe Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 139 violations on file for Ellerbe Town of, of which 59 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.