← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Aberdeen, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
20
detected
12,473
people served
77
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Moore

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

77
health-based violations
95
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-04-01 → 2012-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-01-01 → 2012-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0043 µg/L 4/32 2025
PFBS 0.0259 µg/L 2/32 2025
Pfhxa 0.0035 µg/L 2/32 2025
PFOA 0.0048 µg/L 2/32 2025
PFOS 0.0088 µg/L 2/32 2025
Pfpea 0.0040 µg/L 2/32 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2300 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2440 µg/L
124/252 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
969 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1334 µg/L
45/62 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1230 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2000 µg/L
35/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bhc-Gamma
0.0564 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 0.2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0590 µg/L
29/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.23 pCi/L 65%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.9 pCi/L
28/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Trichloroethylene
6.375 µg/L 127%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.1 µg/L
16/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/20 SYR4 2014–2019
Dalapon
4.705 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.02 µg/L
3/133 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
1.75 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/20 SYR4 2014–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.5950 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
2/86 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.9 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
2/62 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
1970 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
4.6 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/86 SYR4 2012–2019
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
FRICK, KIM
Phone
910-944-7012
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Aberdeen, Town of

Is Aberdeen, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Aberdeen, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Aberdeen, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Fluoride, Bhc-Gamma, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Aberdeen, Town of serve?

Aberdeen, Town of reports serving 12,473 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Aberdeen, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 95 violations on file for Aberdeen, Town of, of which 77 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.