Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-03-01 → 2025-03-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 79 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 63/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 12.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 12/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 72.97 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 73.1 µg/L | 2/80 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
24 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Flowers Plantation
Is Flowers Plantation tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Flowers Plantation's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Flowers Plantation's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Flowers Plantation serve?
Flowers Plantation reports serving 11,643 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Flowers Plantation had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 47 violations on file for Flowers Plantation, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.