Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-11-14 |
| Other | Monitoring | Addressed | 2018-07-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-11 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.12 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.3 µg/L | 65/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 70.36 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.5 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 20.745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 26.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.3 µg/L | 58/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 11.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L | 55/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L | 49/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 20.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L | 38/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 171.85 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 257 µg/L | 28/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 28/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.47 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 7/58 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
22 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Lillington Water
Is Lillington Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Lillington Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Lillington Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Lillington Water serve?
Lillington Water reports serving 3,847 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Lillington Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 29 violations on file for Lillington Water, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.