← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Spring Lake, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
22
detected
11,725
people served
38
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cumberland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

38
health-based violations
139
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0121 µg/L 6/6 2025
PFOA 0.0094 µg/L 6/6 2025
PFOS 0.0156 µg/L 6/6 2025
Pfpea 0.0149 µg/L 6/6 2025
PFBS 0.0064 µg/L 4/6 2025
PFHXS 0.0083 µg/L 4/6 2025
Pfba 0.0079 µg/L 3/6 2025
Pfhpa 0.0055 µg/L 2/6 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
68.6 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95 µg/L
103/103 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
23.0185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.88 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
32.781 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.01 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
22.031 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
99/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
37 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
93/104 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
88/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
87/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
76/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.6554 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.84 µg/L
50/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
43/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
126.85 µg/L 9.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
27/83 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
26/100 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Lead
3.156 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/83 SYR4 2012–2018
22 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
ROSARIO, DEANNA
Phone
910-985-1819
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Spring Lake, Town of

Is Spring Lake, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Spring Lake, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Spring Lake, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Spring Lake, Town of serve?

Spring Lake, Town of reports serving 11,725 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Spring Lake, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 139 violations on file for Spring Lake, Town of, of which 38 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.