← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Pittsboro, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
22
detected
6,708
people served
140
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Chatham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

140
health-based violations
261
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30
TT Health-based Archived 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
TT Health-based Archived 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30
TT Health-based Archived 2009-06-01 → 2009-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0116 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfba 0.0124 µg/L 2/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0057 µg/L 2/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
68.82 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98.6 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.27 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
200.35 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 413 µg/L
60/80 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
17.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
17.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
48/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
59.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.7 µg/L
47/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
35/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
6.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L
23/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2022
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
13/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
9/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
509 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 530 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1440 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
44.287 µg/L 295%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.8 µg/L
7/80 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L
4/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Simazine
0.1955 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2070 µg/L
4/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.5850 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6100 µg/L
3/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.7000 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SAULSBURY, CORY
Phone
919-777-1623
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pittsboro, Town of

Is Pittsboro, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Pittsboro, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pittsboro, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pittsboro, Town of serve?

Pittsboro, Town of reports serving 6,708 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Pittsboro, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 261 violations on file for Pittsboro, Town of, of which 140 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.