Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-07-01 → 2003-07-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 32.8 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.1 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.8 µg/L | 37/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 18.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 29/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 1381.75 µg/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1603 µg/L | 26/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 26/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L | 22/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Xylenes, Total | 14.03 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L | 12/109 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 7.2 pCi/L 144% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 8.2 pCi/L | 11/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 245 µg/L 6.1% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L | 6/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 3.395 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 4/109 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 1.955 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 4/109 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 11.3 µg/L 226% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 3/109 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11.6 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen
Is Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen serve?
Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen reports serving 14,408 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 244 violations on file for Bladen Co Wtr Dist-West Bladen, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.