Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Benaja Crossing Mh S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
6
detected
99
people served
2
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
89
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
8.6 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1690 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
3.7846 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
TTHM
2.9 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.9 µg/L 3.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
70 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ROMAINE, BARBARA
Phone
336-543-9129
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Benaja Crossing Mh S/D

Is Benaja Crossing Mh S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Benaja Crossing Mh S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Benaja Crossing Mh S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Combined Uranium, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Benaja Crossing Mh S/D serve?

Benaja Crossing Mh S/D reports serving 99 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Benaja Crossing Mh S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 89 violations on file for Benaja Crossing Mh S/D, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.