Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 201.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L | 120/300 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 110 µg/L 138% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 120/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 110/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 40.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 96/105 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 38.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L | 96/106 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 38.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 95/105 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 95/105 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.365 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 88/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.97 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 84/105 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 71/106 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 91 µg/L 607% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 12/300 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 12/106 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 10/106 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Dan River Water Inc
Is Dan River Water Inc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Dan River Water Inc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Dan River Water Inc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Dan River Water Inc serve?
Dan River Water Inc reports serving 12,573 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Dan River Water Inc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 167 violations on file for Dan River Water Inc, of which 45 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.