Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 0.0040 µg/L | 1/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 87.6 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L | 133/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 73.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 105 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 57.86 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 127/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 35.04 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 28.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 122/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 40/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 182.2 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 258 µg/L | 29/134 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 19/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 12/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 715 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 820 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 6/129 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 10.4 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 5/134 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate | 170 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.2400 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.8000 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.5000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Reidsville, City of
Is Reidsville, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Reidsville, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Reidsville, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Reidsville, City of serve?
Reidsville, City of reports serving 14,585 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Reidsville, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 192 violations on file for Reidsville, City of, of which 74 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.