← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Burlington, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
23
detected
61,365
people served
24
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Alamance

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

24
health-based violations
170
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0170 µg/L 8/8 2025
PFOA 0.0130 µg/L 7/8 2025
Pfhxa 0.0044 µg/L 3/8 2025
6:2 Fts 0.0097 µg/L 1/8 2025
Pfhpa 0.0042 µg/L 1/8 2025
PFHXS 0.0032 µg/L 1/8 2025
Pfpea 0.0041 µg/L 1/8 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
70 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98 µg/L
275/275 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.35 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 84 µg/L
274/274 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
59.279 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L
268/268 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
28.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
267/267 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
266/267 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
257/258 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
108/269 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
95/271 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
83/263 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
97.4 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 483 µg/L
29/145 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
9.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
17/271 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
702.5 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 710 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Cyanide
146.005 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 154.3 µg/L
4/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
29.1 µg/L 194%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
4/145 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
6 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
86 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
QUEEN, MICHAEL
Phone
336-222-5130
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Burlington, City of

Is Burlington, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Burlington, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Burlington, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Trichloroacetic Acid, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Burlington, City of serve?

Burlington, City of reports serving 61,365 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Burlington, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 170 violations on file for Burlington, City of, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.