← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Monroe, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
18
detected
43,081
people served
28
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Union

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

28
health-based violations
87
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-01-01 → 2003-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0056 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfba 0.0069 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
79.47 µg/L 99%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
43.97 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57 µg/L
127/127 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
101/101 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
101/101 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
96/101 SYR4 2013–2019
Atrazine
0.8000 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L
21/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.705 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
20/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2025
Copper
357.5 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
14/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
12/100 SYR4 2013–2019
Simazine
0.6276 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7460 µg/L
9/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
881 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 950 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1820 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.69 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
3/60 SYR4 2014–2017
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RANKIN, DAVID
Phone
704-282-4668
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Monroe, City of

Is Monroe, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Monroe, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Monroe, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Monroe, City of serve?

Monroe, City of reports serving 43,081 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Monroe, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 87 violations on file for Monroe, City of, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.