← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Norwood, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 106 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

106
contaminants tested
17
detected
4,323
people served
59
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Stanly

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

59
health-based violations
156
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOS 0.0051 µg/L 3/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0032 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
73.14 µg/L 122%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
72/72 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
75.55 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
293.85 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 332 µg/L
54/67 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
12.11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.5 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
58.795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 68.3 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
34.365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.7 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
36.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44 µg/L
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
30/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
14/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Fluoride
559 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.7040 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7700 µg/L
7/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.7 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
4/67 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
9.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
2/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
230 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
KEITH, BRIAN
Phone
704-474-3618
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Norwood, Town of

Is Norwood, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Norwood, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Norwood, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Norwood, Town of serve?

Norwood, Town of reports serving 4,323 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Norwood, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 156 violations on file for Norwood, Town of, of which 59 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.