Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1335.8 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2491 µg/L | 33/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 34.4041 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.4748 µg/L | 23/27 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 763.5 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 840 µg/L | 10/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 12.64 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.9 µg/L | 10/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.78 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 5/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 8.6 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 3/45 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dinoseb | 0.2800 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L | 1/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Vinyl Chloride | 2.2 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 2 µg/L | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fairfield Sapphire
Is Fairfield Sapphire tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Fairfield Sapphire's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fairfield Sapphire's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Combined Uranium, Fluoride, TTHM, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fairfield Sapphire serve?
Fairfield Sapphire reports serving 3,873 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Fairfield Sapphire had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 71 violations on file for Fairfield Sapphire, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.