Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-11-01 → 2021-01-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 7000 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7480 µg/L | 176/570 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 609 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1520 µg/L | 152/180 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| TTHM | 83 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 92/146 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 7016 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7480 µg/L | 73/75 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 8.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 57/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 74.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 94 µg/L | 57/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 821.3 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1060 µg/L | 52/91 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.9 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.3 µg/L | 48/165 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 41/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 33/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 24/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.495 pCi/L 50% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.5 pCi/L | 22/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 11.8 pCi/L 79% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 6/32 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 4.2465 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.47 µg/L | 4/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Benzene | 0.5000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 2/155 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 2/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Toluene | 4.82 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 2/155 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/100 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 9.06 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/80 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Iredell Water Corporation
Is Iredell Water Corporation tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Iredell Water Corporation's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Iredell Water Corporation's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, TTHM, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Iredell Water Corporation serve?
Iredell Water Corporation reports serving 27,173 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Iredell Water Corporation had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1224 violations on file for Iredell Water Corporation, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.